Public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC)

Tags 

An extraordinary event which is determined to constitute a public health risk to other

States through the international spread of disease and to potentially require a

coordinated international response

Some serious public health events that endanger international public health may be

determined under the International Health Regulations to be public health emergencies

of international concern (PHEIC). The term Public Health Emergency of International

Concern is defined in the IHR (2005) as “an extraordinary event which is determined,

as provided in these Regulations:

• to constitute a public health risk to other States through the international spread of

disease; and

• to potentially require a coordinated international response”. This definition implies a

situation that: is serious, unusual or unexpected; carries implications for public

health beyond the affected State’s national border; and may require immediate

international action.

The responsibility of determining whether an event is within this category lies with the

WHO Director-General and requires the convening of a committee of experts – the IHR

Emergency Committee. This committee advises the Director General on the

recommended measures to be promulgated on an emergency basis, known as

temporary recommendations. Temporary recommendations include health measures

to be implemented by the State Party experiencing the PHEIC, or by other States

Parties, to prevent or reduce the international spread of disease and avoid

unnecessary interference with international traffic.

The Emergency Committee also gives advice on the determination of the event as a

PHEIC in circumstances where there is inconsistency in the assessment of the event

between the Director-General and the affected country/countries. The Emergency

Committee continues to provide advice to the Director-General throughout the duration

of the PHEIC, including any necessary changes to the recommended measures and

on the determination of PHEIC termination. WHO maintains an IHR roster of experts

and the members of an IHR Emergency Committee are selected from this roster and/or

WHO expert advisory panels and committees. At least one member of the Emergency

Committee should be an expert nominated by a State Party within whose territory the

event arises (1)

 

(1) IHR Procedures concerning public health emergencies of international concern

(PHEIC)

 

MMLAP and other EU Projects

Health system analysis to support capacity development in response to the threat of pandemic influenza in Asia
Making society an active participant in water adaptation to global change
Public Participation in Developing a Common Framework for Assessment and Management of Sustainable Innovation
Engaging all of Europe in shaping a desirable and sustainable future
Expect the unexpected and know how to respond
Driving innovation in crisis management for European resilience
Effective communication in outbreak management: development of an evidence-based tool for Europe
Solutions to improve CBRNe resilience
Network for Communicable Disease Control in Southern Europe and Mediterranean Countries
Developing the framework for an epidemic forecast infrastructure
Strengthening of the national surveillance system for communicable diseases
Surveillance of vaccine preventable hepatitis
European monitoring of excess mortality for public health action
European network for highly infectious disease
Dedicated surveillance network for surveillance and control of vaccine preventable diseases in the EU
Modelling the spread of pandemic influenza and strategies for its containment and mitigation
Cost-effectiveness assessment of european influenza human pandemic alert and response strategies
Bridging the gap between science, stakeholders and policy makers
Promotion of immunization for health professionals in Europe
Towards inclusive research programming for sustainable food innovations
Addressing chronic diseases and healthy ageing across the life cycle
Medical ecosystem – personalized event-based surveillance
Studying the many and varied economic, social, legal and ethical aspects of the recent developments on the Internet, and their consequences for the individual and society at large
Get involved in the responsible marine research and innovation
Knowledge-based policy-making on issues involving science, technology and innovation, mainly based upon the practices in Parliamentary Technology Assessment
Assessment of the current pandemic preparedness and response tools, systems and practice at national, EU and global level in priority areas
Analysis of innovative public engagement tools and instruments for dynamic governance in the field of Science in Society
Public Engagement with Research And Research Engagement with Society
Computing Veracity – the Fourth Challenge of Big Data
Providing infrastructure, co-ordination and integration of existing clinical research networks on epidemics and pandemics
Promote vaccinations among migrant population in Europe
Creating mechanisms for effectively tackling the scientific and technology related challenges faced by society
Improve the quality of indoor air, keeping it free from radon
Improving respect of ethics principles and laws in research and innovation, in line with the evolution of technologies and societal concerns
Investigating how cities in the West securitise against global pandemics
Creating a structured dialogue and mutual learning with citizens and urban actors by setting up National Networks in 10 countries across Europe
Identifying how children can be change agents in the Science and Society relationship
Establishing an open dialogue between stakeholders concerning synthetic biology’s potential benefits and risks
Transparent communication in Epidemics: Learning Lessons from experience, delivering effective Messages, providing Evidence